Climagate
Algunos extractos de los correo para quienes tengan el tiempo de concentración de un algoritmo de trading de alta frecuencia...
lo que realmente molesta ideológicamente de estos movimientos es que se enfocan en salvar el planeta, pero el hombre es parte integrante de este, de que manera pretenden evitar la influencia del ser humano en el medio ambiente, eliminándolo? no sería un enfoque más razonable el cuidar de la integridad, bienestar, prosperidad y salud del hombre y como consecuencia de esto el entorno sería cuidado en orden a mantener el soporte sustentable? es diferente salvar el planeta que salvar al ser humano, y si ponen atención en el mensaje de estos nuevos profetas, en ningún lado aparece en la ecuación de sustenatbilidad el hombre, salvo cuando se reduce sus influencia, es decir, desaparece.
/// The Medieval Warm Period ///
<5111> Pollack:
But it will be very difficult to make the MWP go away in Greenland.
<5039> Rahmstorf:
You chose to depict the one based on C14 solar data, which kind of stands out
in Medieval times. It would be much nicer to show the version driven by Be10
solar forcing
<5096> Cook:
A growing body of evidence clearly shows [2008] that hydroclimatic variability during the putative MWP (more appropriately and inclusively called the "Medieval Climate Anomaly" or MCA period) was more regionally extreme (mainly in terms of the frequency and duration of megadroughts) than anything we have seen in the 20th century, except perhaps for the Sahel. So in certain ways the MCA period may have been more climatically extreme than in modern times.
/// The Settled Science ///
<0310> Warren:
The results for 400 ppm stabilization look odd in many cases [...] As it stands we'll have to delete the results from the paper if it is to be published.
<1682> Wils:
[2007] What if climate change appears to be just mainly a multidecadal natural fluctuation? They'll kill us probably [...]
<2267> Wilson:
Although I agree that GHGs are important in the 19th/20th century (especially
since the 1970s), if the weighting of solar forcing was stronger in the models,
surely this would diminish the significance of GHGs.
[...] it seems to me that by weighting the solar irradiance more strongly in the
models, then much of the 19th to mid 20th century warming can be explained from
the sun alone.
<5289> Hoskins:
If the tropical near surface specific humidity over tropical land has not gone
up (Fig 5) presumably that could explain why the expected amplification of the
warming in the tropics with height has not really been detected.
<5315> Jenkins/MetO:
would you agree that there is no convincing evidence for kilimanjaro glacier
melt being due to recent warming (let alone man-made warming)?
<2292> Jones:
[tropical glaciers] There is a small problem though with their retreat. They
have retreated a lot in the last 20 years yet the MSU2LT data would suggest
that temperatures haven't increased at these levels.
<1788> Jones:
There shouldn't be someone else at UEA with different views [from "recent
extreme weather is due to global warming"] - at least not a climatologist.
<4693> Crowley:
I am not convinced that the "truth" is always worth reaching if it is at the
cost of damaged personal relationships
<2967> Briffa:
Also there is much published evidence for Europe (and France in particular) of
increasing net primary productivity in natural and managed woodlands that may
be associated either with nitrogen or increasing CO2 or both. Contrast this
with the still controversial question of large-scale acid-rain-related forest
decline? To what extent is this issue now generally considered urgent, or even
real?
<2733> Crowley:
Phil, thanks for your thoughts - guarantee there will be no dirty laundry in
the open.
<2095> Steig:
He's skeptical that the warming is as great as we show in East Antarctica -- he
thinks the "right" answer is more like our detrended results in the
supplementary text. I cannot argue he is wrong.
<0953> Jones:
This will reduce the 1940-1970 cooling in NH temps. Explaining the cooling with
sulphates won't be quite as necessary.
<4944> Haimberger:
It is interesting to see the lower tropospheric warming minimum in the tropics
in all three plots, which I cannot explain. I believe it is spurious but it is
remarkably robust against my adjustment efforts.
<4262> Klein/LLNL:
Does anybody have an explanation why there is a relative minimum (and some
negative trends) between 500 and 700 hPa? No models with significant surface
warming do this
<2461> Osborn:
This is an excellent idea, Mike, IN PRINCIPLE at least. In practise, however,
it raises some interesting results [...] the analysis will not likely lie near to
the middle of the cloud of published series and explaining the reasons behind
this etc. will obscure the message of a short EOS piece.
<4470> Norwegian Meteorological Institute:
In Norway and Spitsbergen, it is possible to explain most of the warming after
the 1960s by changes in the atmospheric circulation. The warming prior to 1940
cannot be explained in this way.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
Mostrar EmotíconesEl objetivo de este Blog es compartir opiniones, así es que tus ideas y sugerencias son bienvenidas...